User talk:EsonLinji

Culture ships & races

I am considering collapsing the culture races into a single article on the Culture. Additionally, I think a "List of Culture Ships" might be better (such article exists), including the details on each. There's really only a paragraph or two per each ship, and it would allow us to consolidate common info into one place. This is how things are done with the various Star Wars/Star Trek/articles, even with Care Bears and Power Rangers. Would you object to this? ... aa:talk 07:44, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

40k references

Hi. Thanks a lot for adding the references to Eldar (Warhammer 40,000). This is just a quick note to say that "we" (the members of WikiProject Warhammer 40,000) are building up a list of fully formatted etc references at WikiProject Warhammer 40,000/References which you can hopefully just copy-and-paste into articles. Cheers --Pak21 14:33, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of GSV Bora Horza Gobuchul

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article GSV Bora Horza Gobuchul, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

no real world notability shown. lacks coverage in sources independent of book.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Duffbeerforme (talk) 15:32, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello EsonLinji! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 507 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Erika Amato - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:22, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of GCU Grey Area

The article GCU Grey Area has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fictional spaceship that fails WP:NFICTION/GNG. Pure WP:PLOT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 15:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of GCU Grey Area for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GCU Grey Area is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GCU Grey Area until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:32, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of spacecraft in the Culture series for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of spacecraft in the Culture series is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of spacecraft in the Culture series until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:36, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]