Jump to content

Talk:Growth factor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

I'm not very familiar with growth factors, but the description seems to be bit different from those for what I'm familiar with...such as EGF, NGF, PDGF, TGF alpha and beta. I'm especially interested in the role of EGF and TGF beta in development.

Hideshi 20:48, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)

I don't know if other people think this is of high importance - I think this page could be made much better. Dr Aaron 03:17, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agreee it can be made much, much better. As for high importance, the (somewhat arbitrary) measure that we use is that we assign a topic "high" importance if it is generally examined at the lower-division college level (RNA polymerase) or briefly mentioned at the high school level (endoplasmic reticulum). I think that this straddles the line between high and mid, and the class assignment of "start" is dead on. I think its current assignments are fine. – ClockworkSoul 13:16, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Growth factor/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This article needs updating or better still, replacing with a better version.

Firstly, growth factors do not have to be proteins. A great many growth factors in plants are hydrocarbons for example.

Secondly, it should be stressed out that a significant part of the scientific community reserves the term 'growth factor' for substances stimulating cell growth, the increase in cell mass, and classes mitogens and survival factors separately. Mentioning cell proliferation as the first function of growth factors is therefore very dubious.

131.111.8.99 (talk) 22:18, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 22:18, 27 April 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 16:47, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Growth factor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:17, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]