Talk:First Sino-Japanese War
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the First Sino-Japanese War article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days ![]() |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on First Sino-Japanese War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080311074213/http://www.russojapanesewar.com/galsworthy.html to http://www.russojapanesewar.com/galsworthy.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:43, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Qing Infobox Casualties update
[edit]On the Chinese version of the page, there's a seemingly more exact breakdown of killed and wounded on the Chinese side of the conflict in the infobox, which maps quite closely to the ~35k the English page has currently.
I can't see any clear source for the breakdown, but if it's valid we should bring it over to this version of the page. 110.145.151.142 (talk) 23:43, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Missing article?
[edit]"After more than six months of unbroken successes by (the) Japanese land and naval forces and the loss of the port of Weihaiwei, the Qing government sued for peace in February 1895".
Shouldn't be there an article between "by" and "Japanese"? Ramiro Echeverría (talk) 20:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Not done Reads OK with or without: successes by Japanese land and [Japanese] naval forces. Cinderella157 (talk) 01:08, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
"this does not generally go here"
[edit]@Remsense "this does not generally go here". Actually it does. Check Second Opium War, Opium Wars, Russo-Japanese War, American Revolutionary War, Mexican–American War. There's more btw. Alexysun (talk) 21:12, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- A collection of other articles being in violation of guidelines (WP:RESULT) doesn't justify another being as such. Feel free to help out by bringing those into line so I don't have to. Remsense诉 21:22, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Remsense Do it. Alexysun (talk) 06:51, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Remsense You claiming that WP:RESULT does not allow for treaties to be stated in a bullet point below the result in the result section of the infobox is an outright lie. Alexysun (talk) 22:45, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
The infobox does not have the scope to reflect nuances, and should be restricted to "X victory" or "Inconclusive". Where the result does not accurately fit with these restrictions use "See aftermath" (or similar) to direct the reader to a section where the result is discussed.
- "Restricted to" makes it rather clear. If you call me a liar again, I am going to report you at ANI.Remsense诉 22:49, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- First, that is an incorrect interpretation of WP:RESULT. I have already consulted the HEAD coordinator of WikiProject Military history, who confirmed that he is not aware of any such restrictions that you mentioned.
Secondly, threatening to report someone who has committed no wrongdoing constitutes an attempt to intimidate and remove them from the platform. Feel free to report me if you wish. I have no fear, for my actions have been above reproach. Alexysun (talk) 23:10, 28 July 2024 (UTC)- What does the word "restricted" mean to you? Similarly, calling an editor a liar and claiming it's beyond reproach shows you are also unaware of what another policy, WP:NPA, plainly says. It seems you are saying your personal attacks are "beyond reproach". Remsense诉 23:11, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- I really dislike doing it, but I'm going to ping @Hawkeye7 since their comments are being leveraged in this discussion. Remsense诉 23:20, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- What does the word "restricted" mean to you? Similarly, calling an editor a liar and claiming it's beyond reproach shows you are also unaware of what another policy, WP:NPA, plainly says. It seems you are saying your personal attacks are "beyond reproach". Remsense诉 23:11, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Ditto. Cinderella157 (talk) 23:28, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Ditto to me or @Remsense? Alexysun (talk) 06:53, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- My "Ditto" means, what Remsense to you. Cinderella157 (talk) 23:50, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- B-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in History
- B-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in History
- B-Class vital articles in History
- B-Class China-related articles
- Top-importance China-related articles
- B-Class China-related articles of Top-importance
- WikiProject China articles
- B-Class Japan-related articles
- Top-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles
- B-Class Korea-related articles
- High-importance Korea-related articles
- Korean military history task force articles
- WikiProject Korea articles
- B-Class military history articles
- B-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- B-Class Chinese military history articles
- Chinese military history task force articles
- B-Class Japanese military history articles
- Japanese military history task force articles