Jump to content

User:Winhunter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)


Articles I...

[edit]

Created

[edit]

Expanded significantly

[edit]

My other accounts

[edit]

My bookmarks

[edit]
Dashboard

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
...from administrators 3
Requests for unblock 110
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 74
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 47
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 15
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 11
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 68
Requested RD1 redactions 9
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 3
Candidates for speedy deletion 15
Open sockpuppet investigations 194
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

[edit]

Reports

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]
Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 0
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 2
Importance or significance not asserted 0
Possibly contested candidates 1
Other candidates 13
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 1 item

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 37 items

Requested RD1 redactions – 9 items

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently
Usernames for administrator attention


User-reported

[edit]
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

[edit]
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Request raising protection to indefinite ECP per WP:GENSEX CTOP due to repeated oversightable BLP violations to prevent further disruption. Raladic (talk) 03:27, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Daniel Case. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Moderated a polarized debate, going to get vandalized EditingCabbageLilly (talk) 03:31, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Joyous!. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting page protection due to high traffic and potential for disruptive edits as the election date approaches. This topic is susceptible and has already drawn significant attention from various editors, leading to frequent edits and concerns over biased or unsourced information being added. Semi-protection (or full protection, if warranted) would be appropriate until after the election period to maintain the article's neutrality and accuracy. IDB.S (talk) 04:13, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Come back if the situation changes. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Series of disruptive edits to the BLP of one of the moderators of the US presidential debate tonight. Innisfree987 (talk) 04:26, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:11, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP hopper keeps on coming days after days and months after months to change the town lead to suburb which it clearly isn't, they don't reply on their talk page, do nothing, they come change without sources at random times. The town is clearly has its own jurisdiction and miles away from Vijayawada, not even once source confirms that it is a suburb. The IP hopper is clearly not helping with holding a discussion. Requesting indefinite semi protection. Thewikizoomer (talk) 04:29, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Very few edits in the last six months. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Pachu Kannan (talk) 05:06, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logging at AEL. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP vandalism. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 05:28, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Fully protected: Repeatedly recreated. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 05:29, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

[edit]
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Current requests for edits to a protected page

[edit]
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


"On 1 April, seven aid workers from World Central Kitchen, including British, Polish, Australian, and Irish nationals, were killed in an Israeli airstrike south of Deir al-Balah" is incorrect and should be reworded as
"On 1 April, seven aid workers from World Central Kitchen, including a dual US-Canada national, a Palestinian, three British citizens, an Australian, and a Pole, were killed in an Israeli airstrike south of Deir al-Balah" as per [1], [2]. 148.75.59.49 (talk) 23:26, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

I suggest adding to 'War Crimes' a section about the Sde Teiman detention camp. The use of concentration/torture camps is a very notable war crime and an important fact as it pertains to the ceasefire negotiations regarding hostage swaps. It is also relevant as many have been taken from Gaza and are being tortured under pretext of "interrogation." Jdftba (talk) 08:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Under "casaulties and losses" Under "Syria" Add these events: https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/israel-carries-intense-strikes-central-syria-killing-4-113503912 https://apnews.com/article/israel-syria-strikes-hama-iran-hezbollah-916f12c8f1fae066439733c2c0ba9980 Adjust total death toll accordingly. Beri98 (talk) 13:09, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Handled requests

[edit]

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

14 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Wikipedia languages/core (request) 2024-07-27 11:23 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
Template:Wikipedia languages (request) 2024-07-30 19:50 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
MediaWiki:Editinginterface (request) 2024-08-22 20:14 MediaWiki page (log)
Template:Editnotices/Namespace/MediaWiki (request) 2024-08-22 20:14 Fully protected (log) Protected by Amalthea on 2011-05-31: "interface page, transcluded in MadiaWiki space"
User:HotArticlesBot/Config.json (request) 2024-08-27 11:03 User JSON page (log)
Template:Dablink (request) 2024-08-31 15:54 Fully protected (log) Protected by Ral315 on 2005-12-20: "High visibility, no need to edit it."
Template:In string (request) 2024-09-03 23:19 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
Template:Collapse top (request) 2024-09-04 04:57 Fully protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2019-02-25: "High-risk template or module; used in system message"
User:Community Tech bot/Popular pages config.json (request) 2024-09-05 19:39 User JSON page (log)
Allan Lichtman (request) 2024-09-06 05:12 Fully protected, expires 2024-09-16 at 12:23:11 UTC (log) Protected by Primefac on 2024-08-16: "Edit warring / content dispute"
Template:Blocked text (request) 2024-09-06 21:08 Fully protected (log) Protected by MSGJ on 2022-02-25: "Highly visible template: used in interface messages"
Targeted Individual (request) 2024-09-10 10:39 Fully protected (log) Modified by Xaosflux on 2016-02-18: "salted articles should not be created by template editors either"
Targeted Individuals (request) 2024-09-10 10:39 Fully protected (log) Modified by Xaosflux on 2016-02-18: "salted articles should not be created by template editors either"
Template:Editnotices/Namespace/Category (request) 2024-09-10 16:15 Fully protected (log) Protected by Amalthea on 2011-05-31: "interface page, transcluded in MadiaWiki space"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 16:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
16 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Module:Football box (request) 2024-08-09 15:51 Template-protected (log) Protected by Plastikspork on 2018-10-17: "High-risk Lua module"
Module:Football box collapsible (request) 2024-08-09 15:51 Template-protected (log) Protected by Plastikspork on 2018-10-17: "High-risk Lua module"
Module:Lang-zh (request) 2024-08-17 15:53 Template-protected (log) From Module:Zh: Protected by HJ Mitchell on 2014-05-03: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Infobox comedian (request) 2024-08-20 02:45 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:MultiReplace (request) 2024-08-20 06:46 Template-protected (log) Protected by MusikAnimal on 2017-10-09: "Highly visible template; 34,000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox song contest national year (request) 2024-08-23 19:56 Template-protected (log) Modified by CT Cooper on 2015-03-01: "Merging has increased use, so upping protection to template editors only."
Template:Infobox election (request) 2024-08-24 13:40 Template-protected (log) Modified by Xaosflux on 2016-03-02: ">9500 transclusions, set to change from SP/A to TE/TE"
Template:Talk header (request) 2024-08-24 22:41 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mr. Stradivarius on 2013-12-13: "Highly visible template: allow template editors"
Template:Coat of arms (request) 2024-08-25 01:21 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2020-08-29: "High-risk template"
Module:Excerpt/config (request) 2024-08-27 04:54 Template-protected (log) Modified by Johnuniq on 2020-08-30: "oops, meant to be TP"
Module:Routemap (request) 2024-08-28 17:00 Template-protected (log) Modified by Materialscientist on 2016-11-21: "Highly visible template"
Module:AfC submission catcheck (request) 2024-09-01 00:14 Template-protected (log) From Module:AFC submission catcheck: Modified by Courcelles on 2014-04-20: "Per RFPP request, "mother" template only template protected now"
User:AmandaNP/UAA/Blacklist (request) 2024-09-05 06:52 Template-protected (log) From User:DeltaQuad/UAA/Blacklist: Modified by AmandaNP on 2016-02-12: "we are going to try letting template editors edit"
Template:Active politician (request) 2024-09-09 15:22 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Module:Self (request) 2024-09-09 19:46 Template-protected (log) Protected by Pppery on 2024-04-29: ""
Template:SLBY/box (request) 2024-09-11 03:33 Template-protected (log) Modified by BrownHairedGirl on 2018-11-21: "Highly visible template"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 03:37, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

WP:RFA

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 08:54, 6 September 2024 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

WP:PERM

Requests for accountcreator

Account creator

[edit]

On Sept 21st I will be offering a training to beginner editors during the World Congress of Audiology in Paris We will introduce participants to Global Audiology. I anticipate I will need to allow the creation of some new accounts at the same time, so I ask for this user right from Sept 21 to 23rd. I already hold this permission with both Portuguese and testwiki.

Thank you TMorata (talk) 14:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

[edit]

Been on Wikipedia for a few years now. Mainly created BLPs. Requesting for autopatrolled rights to reduce the backlog of new page patrollers. I declare that I've understood verifiability, notability and copyrights. SerChevalerie (talk) 21:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

 On hold. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:46, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Okay, the user's talk page history is back. This can now be evaluated normally. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:12, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Requesting autopatrolled for Chaotic Enby. Trusted user who already has NPP rights, articles are consistently well-written and well-sourced. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 20:38, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 23:55, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Created 407 articles, and only 2 were deleted—1 was soft deleted earlier in 2022, and the latest one was deleted per WP:A10, which is not a major issue. 99.5% or 405 of his articles are still live. I came across him while patrolling New Pages. I believe he is one of the users for whom this right was created. GrabUp - Talk 17:27, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

[edit]


Requesting access for updating census data of highly populated Indian villages in Kerala state and other human settlements on this planet in future. Pachu Kannan (talk) 10:12, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

I would like access to AWB to fix CheckWiki issues more efficiently than I currently do using WPCleaner. I also want to streamline typo fixing as part of WP:TYPO. I understand I have been denied it twice in the recent past, but I strongly believe that I am fit for getting the permission now, as I gained significantly more experience and done more constructive edits. Bunnypranav (talk) 14:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for autowikibrowser declined in the past 90 days ([3][4]). MusikBot talk 14:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

I want to change a string "2019 redefinition of the SI base units" to "2019 revision of the SI" across pages that define the SI units. If it works well I may do similar edits in future. I have experience with Wikipedia and scripted file editing generally. Thanks. Johnjbarton (talk) 22:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Been meaning to apply for a while, but the immediate task that pushed me to do so is correcting a bunch of links to a disambiguated article. Tule-hog (talk) 22:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.

Confirmed

[edit]
Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

[edit]

Can i please have extended confirmed rights back. I lost it because one day when i had a little less than 500 edits, i made about 45-55 edits in one hour in order to get to 500 edits. Im new to this site and didn't know gaming edits was against the rules. Ever since i lost the extended confirmed thing, I've made hundreds of edits i think are constructive and i stopped vandalism a few times and have a much better understanding of the rules. extended confirmed rights HumansRightsIsCool (talk) 21:59, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for extended confirmed declined in the past 90 days ([5]) and has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([6]). MusikBot talk 22:00, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag.

Event coordinator

[edit]
Requests for file mover

File mover

[edit]
I upload image files quite regularly, and occasionally notice (or make) typos that I would like to correct with non-controversial moves. I thought it's about time I stop bothering other editors and get the permission myself. Muhandes (talk) 11:22, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

[edit]

Good day. I previously requested this permission but was declined due to lack of editing time on this account (I worked on an IP previously but have no way to prove this). At the risk of appearing too eager for this permission, I am requesting it again as I now have lengthier editing experience. I have demonstrated experience in AfC, AfD, CSD, draftification, and article creation. I also maintain rollbacker and pending change permissions. I believe I can be help bring down the NPP backlog and have the experience and policy understanding that is necessary to do so accurately. Garsh (talk) 01:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([7]). MusikBot talk 01:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

I think I can consider myself fully back from my wikibreak now and I'd like to request NPP rights again. I haven't participated in any AFDs or AFCs since I returned but hopefully that won't be a problem because I've only been away for about half a year. ~ F4U (talkthey/it) 03:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Greetings! I have previously been granted the NPP right for a month, and my trial is about to expire in a few days. And I am thus here to request the right again. You may also post some advice on what I could do better down below. Thanks! Pygos (talk) 12:10, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 12:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

I'm actively participating in the September 2024 backlog drive. I've reviewed and patrolled lots of articles, disambiguation pages, redirects, drafts, and user pages. My trial will expire on 20, I really enjoyed the experience and would like to continue reviewing new pages. Thank you, Waqar💬 15:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 15:20, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

[edit]


I have been editing since 2005 with over 15,000 edits without incident. I am requesting this permission so I am able to perform round robin moves when necessary. I am also open to assisting at WP:RM. James (talk/contribs) 21:34, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

@James Allison: I'm not seeing any problems, but you don't really have a lot of recent activity regarding moves. Do you expect to get much use out of this permission? Elli (talk | contribs) 19:39, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
I expect to contribute at RM if granted the permission. James (talk/contribs) 00:14, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

I'm 2RDD. With over a thousand edits and experience in maintaining article quality, I'm eager to help with page moves. I understand the importance of accurate titles and want to assist in keeping our namespace organized. I've reviewed the page move guidelines and am familiar with the process. Granting me Page Mover rights would allow me to efficiently rename pages, reducing the workload for administrators. Thanks for considering my request! 2RDD (talk) 10:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 1199 total edits. MusikBot talk 10:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
 Not done, fails minimum requirements. Primefac (talk) 17:38, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

[edit]

I edit AusPol pages, and I'd like to be able to approve edits made to them :) No stress if I need more of a track record of edits - I totally understand. Jy Sandford (talk) 23:44, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 94 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 23:50, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
 Not done. With all due respect, 94 edits to the mainspace is simply not enough editing experience for me to determine whether you'll be able to use the right appropriately. Please spend a few months establishing a track record of positive contributions before reapplying, thanks. -Fastily 23:44, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

I have reviewed the criteria for receiving this permission, and feel my contribution history demonstrates an adequate knowledge of creating, expanding, and patrolling articles in accordance to Wikipedia policies. Tvfunhouse (talk) 00:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Heyo, I'm writing to request the Pending Change Reviewer permission. I'm well versed in the use of tools such as RCPatrol and after reading Wikipedia:Reviewing_pending_changes I believe I'd be a good fit for the Pending changes reviewer permission. Thanks for your consideration, Mark MarkRosenbaum (talk) 21:49, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Heyo, Just wanted to add that I was recently granted the rollback permission. MarkRosenbaum (talk) 17:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 23:54, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

I would like to be able to help with the backlogs present in this area, and feel that I have enough experience to help out. I feel that my track record in this general area is quite good. Thanks, Kingsmasher678 (talk) 19:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Rollback#User:TyphoonAmpil i anti-vandalism edits 🌀TyphoonAmpil Tools 04:00, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 17 days. MusikBot talk 04:10, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
 Request withdrawn Per Fastily and wait 30 days 🌀TyphoonAmpil Tools 07:08, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

[edit]

Hello to anyone concerned.

I am requesting rollbacker rights, having done so before without the knowledge of having to warn users after undoing their edits, and I believe I now have a substantial track record of doing so ever since promising to fulfill that role. I now also have a good idea of how to use tools such as Twinkle effectively, which have greatly helped my work against vandalism.

Thanks for taking your time to read my request. Best regards, Vasil3fonov (talk) 16:56, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([8]). MusikBot talk 17:00, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
You are still consistently failing to notify editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 09:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
The three sole examples of me not doing it from the past month and a half, which you are referring to, are the same single person, making the same changes over and over to player statistics tables through different IPs for the past 12+ months. I looked up different pages that match the categories of the ones I've undone, and the user has been warned multiple times, to no effect, making the same edit again and again. They then stop editing from that IP and start doing the same exact edits from a new one. They have been warned multiple times by multiple users for the exact same edit yet still repeatedly undo other users' work without any explanation when they are clearly in the wrong. Examples of this are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, etc., etc.; some of those edits were way over a year ago, and I am only referencing the ones that the user has been warned for (there are thousands of other such cases from tens, if not hundreds of different IPs) that they haven't been warned for by users who revert their edits. In this case, I have decided that reaching out to the user is futile and I believe that in such extreme examples, that should be an option. What is the point of a warning the user when it is clearly proven that they will keep doing it from new IPs and never read the original talk page anyway?
I have not failed to warn a single other user for the time period since I had promised to do so, which I believe is the whole point of rollback rights in the first place. I strongly believe that this specific, and definitely irregular, case is not sufficient to justify the denial of the rights. However, this is just my point of view on the topic and if you really believe that I am in the wrong and that I should repeatedly (and foolishly) warn the same user for the same thing that they will not stop doing, and expecting a different result, then maybe I do not really need rollback rights in the end if that is to be your final verdict.
Thanks, Vasil3fonov (talk) 11:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
You're clearly missing the point. The notifications aren't for you, they're of value to the patrolling admin and anyone interested in curtailing/tracking abuse. If you had tried the tools I linked above, you would know that notifying an editor takes a grand total of 3 clicks and 5 seconds. If that's still too much effort for you, then it's high time for you to explore other aspects of Wikipedia that don't involve counter-vandalism. The very fact that you spent more time to compose this nonsensical essay for the sake of argument strongly suggests to me that you are not ready for rollback. Nonetheless, I have reviewed your contributions since your previous request and you haven't made enough reverts for me to determine whether you'd be able to use rollback correctly. -Fastily 19:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Fair enough, I can totally agree with the final sentence and I think that would've sufficed. I can't figure out how to use Twinkle and that's on my end. When I use the "rollback" or "vandalism" button, it just opens the user's talk page and I need to manually put in the specific warning template each time. That's more effort than you've pointed out and not something I'm willing to do in cases such as the one you've labelled "nonsensical". And now that I've mentioned the "case", that user is already reverting my reverts of their edits despite the issued warnings on their other IPs' talk pages, but I suppose that's not something that can be dealt with by any available tools to me or the admins.
And just to be clear, I wasn't arguing for the sake of it, I really do believe I've missed the point of rollback in general, so I will withdraw my request and won't submit one in the future. Vasil3fonov (talk) 20:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
That's not accurate. We have multiple avenues for dealing with long term abusers, namely WP:AIV, WP:SPI, WP:RFPP. According to your edit history, I see you've made a handful of requests to RFPP, a single edit to AIV, and no edits to SPI. I do suggest you try those first before throwing up your hands and proclaiming that all is lost. To be clear, I'm happy to grant you rollback if you can both demonstrate a need for it and understanding of how to use it appropriately. Apologies if I sounded harsh above. If you do decide to take up RecentChanges patrol, then I hope to see you back here. Closing as  Not done per your request. -Fastily 00:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
I will look into other ways to counter the issue then, thanks for the advice. And I see my previous mistake, it's definitely not your fault for replying in that way, so no offence taken. Cheers, Vasil3fonov (talk) 07:57, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi everyone, I'm 2RDD. I've been editing Wikipedia for a year now and have made over a thousand edits. I'm passionate about maintaining article quality and combating vandalism. I believe Rollbacker rights would help me make a bigger impact. I'm eager to take on this responsibility and contribute to our community's mission. Thanks for considering my request! Best, 2RDD (talk) 10:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([9]). MusikBot talk 10:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
 Not done Sorry, but you have very little experience reverting vandalism. Please request when you have a track record of reverting vandalism. Malinaccier (talk) 13:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Hey, I would like to request for the rollback permission because I am engaged in rollback activities very much for some time. This permission would be very helpful and will make my Wiki activity very easier. Moreover, I am experienced enough with enough edits and edit time in Wikipedia. I have read everything about this tool and will abide by all the rules too.! Thanking you! TheProEditor11 (talk) 10:52, 8 September 2024 (UTC) TheProEditor11 (talk) 10:52, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

 Not done I reviewed your contributions and found little to no recent anti-vandalism work. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 19:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello! I would like access to rollback rights in order to use tools such as Huggle that require rollback rights. Most of my edits have been anti-vandalism work, and I feel that access to these tools would help me revert and warn more effectively. I would like to mention that there may be a few problems with my edits that anyone reviewing may bring up:

1. In my first few reverts (using only the built-in undo tool) before I was auto-confirmed, I did fail to notify some of the users I was reverting. This is mainly because I didn't yet have access to RedWarn, Twinkle, or Ultraviolet in order to warn users quickly. Secondly, I was not aware of the correct procedure to deal with Vandalism. Now, however, almost every revert has been using Ultraviolet or RedWarn and I have been giving warnings to every user. I believe I have a sufficient track record of doing this that you can see in my contribs. I have read all relevant procedures relating to Rollback and how to deal with Vandalism, including Wikipedia:Vandalism, Wikipedia:Rollback, Wikipedia:Reverting, as well as Wikipedia:Username policy. You can also see in my contribs that after I read the relevant procedures but before I was autoconfirmed, I manually warned some of the users that I was reverting.

2. I am applying slightly before I have one month of experience. If I need to reapply in two weeks or so, I will be happy to. However, I believe that my track record shows that a large majority of my reverts have been helpful and demonstrate good understanding of the policy as I've learned it.

Thanks TryAgainSooner (talk) 17:06, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 139 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 17:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
 Request withdrawn Totally thought I had more main space edits/reverts. Will re-submit when I reach a month and around 250 main space edits. TryAgainSooner (talk) 17:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello i have Over 200 mainspace edits. Im patrolling Special:RecentChanges. i use Ultraviolet. i Don't have edit warring. i Meet Criteria for Rollback. 🌀TyphoonAmpil Tools 03:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

 Not done I noticed you started actively editing 2 weeks ago. While I appreciate your enthusiasm, I'd like to see you spend at least a month gaining experience editing Wikipedia before assigning you advanced permissions. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits (I recommend using tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet which makes this extremely easy). Thanks, Fastily 06:53, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
    Category tracker

    Immediate requests

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Wikipedians looking for help 0
    Requests for unblock 114
    Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
    Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 3
    Candidates for speedy deletion 15
    Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 11

    Deletion

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Articles for deletion 855
    Templates for deletion 201
    Categories for deletion 130
    Wikipedia files for discussion 26
    All redirects for discussion 429
    Miscellaneous pages for deletion 45
    Possible copyright violations 19
    All articles proposed for deletion 206
    All files proposed for deletion 3
    Unsorted AfD debates 1
    All files with the same name on Commons 0
    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Orphaned non-free use 531
    Unknown copyright status 23
    Unknown source 17
    No non-free use rationale 2
    Replaceable non-free use images 15
    Disputed non-free use images 5

    Page protection

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Protected 10
    Semi-protected user and user talk pages 1,239
    Fully protected user and user talk pages 445
    Protected against vandalism 4
    Protected talk pages of blocked users 34
    Semi-protected 2,462
    Arbitration 500/30 restricted 0

    Cleanup

    [edit]

    General cleanup

    Category Entries Percentage
    All pages needing cleanup 34,622 0.5
    All articles needing rewrite 5,829 0.08
    All articles needing expert attention 1,316 0.02
    All Wikipedia articles in need of updating 38,973 0.57

    Reference problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    All pages needing factual verification 10,914 0.16
    All articles with unsourced statements 525,864 7.64
    All articles lacking sources 83,332 1.21
    All unreferenced BLPs 699 0.06
    All articles needing additional references 463,648 6.74
    All articles needing references cleanup 4,539 0.07
    All articles lacking in-text citations 105,578 1.53
    All articles with dead external links 305,011 4.43

    Image cleanup problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    Image files for cleanup 17 -
    Wikipedia files lacking a description 142 -
    Wikipedia files with unknown source 17 -

    Other problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    All articles to be merged 1,729 0.03
    All articles to be split 805 0.01
    Unsorted Stubs 0 -
    Stub categories 19,232 -
    All uncategorized pages 1,113 0.02
    All orphaned articles 55,135 0.8
    All articles needing copy edit 2,811 0.04
    All articles with style issues 19,400 0.28
    All Wikipedia articles needing context 2,741 0.04
    All articles that may contain original research 16,565 0.24


    Miscellaneous

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Requested moves 401
    All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes 7,659
    All accuracy disputes 15,750
    Articles with invalid ISBNs 1
    Articles with invalid ISSNs 3
    All articles to be expanded 66,186

    Special pages

    [edit]
    Maintenance reports Information
    Broken redirects
    Dead-end pages Dead-end pages
    Dormant pages Dusty articles
    DoubleRedirects Double redirects
    Lonely pages Orphaned articles
    Long pages
    New pages New page patrol
    New pages feed Page curation
    Protected pages Protection policy
    Short pages
    Uncategorized Categorization
    Uncategorized cats
    Uncategorized templates
    Unused categories
    Unused files (images)
    Unused templates
    Without interwiki links
    Most interwiki links


    Sub-page listing

    [edit]

    Hong Kong

    [edit]
    Hong Kong skyline at night

    Misc

    [edit]
    Delete Keep Neutral Oppose Support Note Template



    Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0
    I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides.