Jump to content

Talk:HNoMS Uredd (P41)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Was the class really called ULA? I thought the only Ula-class was produced from the 1970s and onwards. There is one Ula-class submarine called Uredd, and this is still in operation. But I think the name Uredd is a traditional Norwegian submarine nameInge 01:32, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • aha, you're right - my apologies - see, this is what happens when Canadians write about Norwegian ships :) Sherurcij 02:59, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
It isn't easy to keep up with all the ships with the same name:) But tradition is important in the navy. I noticed the same problem in an article about HNoMS Valkyrien (1994-present) and it led to HNoMS Valkyrien. I did my service in the Royal Norwegian Navy and most of your info was unknown to me so I am impressed :) Inge 19:03, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Someting about the Uredd on RNON web pageInge 01:07, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of small corrections. The submarine P-41 was named Uredd (norwegian for fearless) and NOT HNoMS Uredd. The "HNoMS" was not used on norwegian warships and submarines before after the second world war. Uredd was not a U-class submarine as this class was first used as a term for the norwegian submarines in service aquired from the UK after the war. Norway operated 5 U-class submarines (Utstein, UIa, Utvær, Uthaug and Utsira) after the war. In addition was three K-class submarines (german VIIC submanrines from the war) operated. They were releaved by the german-produced Kobben-class (type-207) in the mid-60. Compared with the U-class boats, Uredd was a bit smaller, but quite similiar in design.

Fair use rationale for Image:Uredd marker.jpg

[edit]

Image:Uredd marker.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:P41-uredd.jpg

[edit]

Image:P41-uredd.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HNoMS Uredd (P41). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:05, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]