Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

Purge
Shortcut WP:AFD/T

12 August 2024

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< August 11	August 13 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Dame Un Beso (Menudo song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Song has no claim of notability. Notability tag has twice been removed without any expansion to the article. Not included on the group's discography page, with its only mention as part of the track listing for the soundtrack to Una aventura llamada Menudo, which at best is a redirect target. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:42, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:42, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question - How is the Una Aventura Llamada Menudo page "at best a redirect target"? That film was seen all over Latin America and was popular among Menudo fans...also, I vote keep. Jeanette Dame tu un Beso a Mi Martin Loser's page, 22:09, 12 August, 2024 (UTC)

Caleb Avilés

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Puerto Rican singer who was a member of bands Euphoria, Explosion, MDO and Menudo: La Reunion. Can find nothing to indicate notability outside the various bands. Redirection per WP:BANDMEMBER seems appropriate here but unsure which band should be the target. John B123 (talk) 21:37, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Music, and Puerto Rico. John B123 (talk) 21:37, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cyber-Enhanced Working Dog

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously PRODed but clearly not notable. All sources I can see are recycled press releases from 2014. Mccapra (talk) 20:47, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and Products. Mccapra (talk) 20:47, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Wyatt

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ron Wyatt was, according to fellow Christian fundamentalists, a fraud. But we can't really source that because no reliable source has covered it. The lack of interest from reality-based sources extends to everything else about the man. While the article has superficial referenciness, the sources cited fail to meet the Wikipedia standards of reliability and independence.This is a squarely WP:FRINGE topic that needs robust sourcing to maintain a solidly reality-based perspective.

There's a source represented as "andrews.edu" but in fact a monograph published in the Adventist Review (Wyatt was a member of the Seventh-day Adventist Church). We have an article on "maintaining creationist integrity" - a horse that bolted so long ago that was long since rendered into glue - by Ken Ham and others, on the AiG website, an obviously unreliable source for anything even tangentially connected to reality. We have allthatsinteresting.com, which takes itself moderately seriously but largely draws on the same creationist argumentation as above.

I really don't think we can defend having an article on a pseudoarchaeologist when we can't even source the fact that he was a pseudoarchaeologist. Guy (help! - typo?) 20:42, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Guy (help! - typo?) 20:42, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Durupınar site, which seems to be what he is (very vaguely) notable for. Slatersteven (talk) 20:50, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bible, Archaeology, and Tennessee. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:54, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this article should have never been created to begin with, due to the lack of reliable references. Catfurball (talk) 21:44, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vitali Yatsko

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A 'senior coach' is not the manager and is not an inherently notable position, especially since WP:FOOTYN is no longer valid. I can't find anything more than passing mentions of Yatsko, including the 4 references already used. My own searches yielded nothing better than Sports.kz and Sports Daily, both passing mentions again. Does not seem to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:41, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Moldova, and Russia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:41, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:52, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Christophe Chaptal de Chanteloup

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

LinkedIn-style resume of a successful career teacher and organisation leader but nothing here passes WP:NPROF or any other notability criteria. Apparently an autobiography. Mccapra (talk) 20:34, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Businesspeople, and France. Mccapra (talk) 20:34, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability not found. Almost nobody has cited their publications. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:27, 12 August 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Dmitri Dmitruk

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. The references and external links are all database type entries. North8000 (talk) 20:18, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Russia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:35, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:52, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kübra (series)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of notability under GNG or SNG. Has zero sources except for an IMDB link much less GNG sources.Tagged by others for wp:notability since May North8000 (talk) 20:14, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Turkey. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:34, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: sources= https://www.leisurebyte.com/kubra-review-cagatay-ulusoy/ (in English, but I am not familiar with that site; a few other sources in English, such as https://www.sportskeeda.com/pop-culture/kubra-complete-list-cast-turkish-drama-thriller) ; https://www.programme-tv.net/news/series-tv/345078-kubra-que-vaut-la-nouvelle-serie-mysterieuse-de-netflix/ ;https://www.libremedia.ca/kubra-lexplication-de-la-fin-qui-laisse-sans-voix/ ; https://actus.sfr.fr/cine-series/series/kubra-la-serie-netflix-aura-t-elle-droit-a-une-saison-2_AN-202401250004.html ; https://actualitte.com/article/115008/adaptation/netflix-adapte-un-roman-turc-avant-une-traduction-francaise ; https://www.purebreak.com/news/-l-histoire-est-dingue-en-seulement-3-jours-cette-serie-glacante-affole-netflix-et-cartonne-en-france/248076(in French); https://www.nit.pt/cultura/televisao/kubra-a-netflix-continua-a-investir-nas-super-producoes-da-turquia https://www.metroworldnews.com.br/entretenimento/2024/02/16/esta-serie-turca-de-acao-e-misterio-na-netflix-tem-todos-viciados-e-prova-que-nem-tudo-e-drama/ (in Portuguese). In those two languages more sources exist. + article in Gazete Duvar accessible through the Turkish WP page (Willing to add those sources and expand content later, fwiw.) There are more than enough references in reliable media to retain the page in my view. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 22:17, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nana 10

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nana 10 was quite popular and is perhaps worthy of an article, however the article is ridiculously short. Nana 10 was an activity of Channel 10 (Israel), where it is properly mentioned however ALL DETAILS ARE MISSING at Channel 10 (Israel). As a totally IMPROPER SPINOUT it should be merged into Channel 10. There is another procedure for mergers yet currently cleaning up Israeli websites and keeping the debates together. gidonb (talk) 19:56, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Websites, and Israel. gidonb (talk) 19:56, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Friedrich Wilhelm Quintscher

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established; mentions, but no in-depth sources exist. Skyerise (talk) 19:54, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Magic, Religion, and Germany. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:33, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. I see a consensus to Keep this article. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:45, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Honey_G (rapper)

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable reality TV contestant. She has had no career beyond being a novelty act on one series on The X Factor, with no success in the industry outside of that. SnookerLoopyOneFourSeven (talk) 15:20, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 August 5. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:47, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notability isn't a measure of talent; it's a measure of significant coverage in reliable sources. Subject is still getting coverage years after X-Factor. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:56, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The link is to a disambiguation page. It should be Honey G (rapper). Athel cb (talk) 16:14, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Leaning keep as to both the individual, for whom flash-in-the-pan coverage is coverage still, and the disambiguation page necessitated by their ambiguity with another equally obscure topic. BD2412 T 16:54, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, and England. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:08, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 19:45, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: meets WP:BASIC pretty easily. C F A 💬 20:48, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The Jerusalem Herald

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Temporary activity of two journalists. The website folded even though we gave it unwarranted publicity for 5 years. Refs are irrelevant to notability. No article on Hewiki. No indication that this meets NCORP and no encyclopedic value even under the GNG (a lower bar than the applicable standard). The entry has a strange focus on the biblical sources of the website's logo. gidonb (talk) 19:39, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Companies, Websites, and Israel. gidonb (talk) 19:39, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom. Fails NCORP. C F A 💬 20:57, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is more a site tour of a non-notable blog which seems to take its design too seriously, than actually talking about what its content involved. Nate • (chatter) 22:21, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HaKol HaYehudi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable operation that fails NCORP. The raid on their facilities deserves some mention and is in fact mentioned at Yitzhar#2011. Not linked back, hence the article is an unmarked orphan. Both the Enwiki and Hewiki articles are refbombed with news items on the website. Should be redirected to Yitzhar#2011 or deleted. gidonb (talk) 19:31, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Companies, Websites, and Israel. gidonb (talk) 19:31, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Embassy of Bolivia, London

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No secondary sources. Fails WP:GNG. Very little content, effectively a directory listing. AusLondonder (talk) 18:38, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Organizations, United Kingdom, and Bolivia. AusLondonder (talk) 18:38, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Raison d'être (band)

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is not a band. It is solely the musician Peter Andersson (musician) which is up for AfD. No notable labels associated. Both pages, due to numerous aliases and other associations that all lead back to original BLP, only cite primary sources. Not RS. It should have never passed first AfD. No reviews or significant coverage, radio airplay, etc. Fails criteria.

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Music. Maineartists (talk) 18:56, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. The prior AFD identified some sources (one being an interview, which can be ignored), but all of them have suffered from link rot and are no longer available. If a WP:BEFORE search 15 years later has also turned up no evidence of notability, then there isn't any reason to keep this article. The only thing that gives me pause is the lengthy list of CD releases. If two of them aren't self-published, then this one-person band would pass WP:BAND criterion #5, but that's turning out to be impossible to verify. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:01, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:34, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Endorsements for the 2006 Liberal Party of Canada leadership election

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

On the face of it someone put in a fair bit of work into this, but as about half of the entries are unsourced, with very old citation needed templates, we are left with a page that is not very accurate on a subject that is not very notable, and not very likely to ever get finished. The leadership election of the Canadian liberal party in 2006 is almost certainly notable, but a list of who endorsed whom is not. What it is, is original research. If someone has put together this list and it is referred to in a secondary source, then it is notable but could be mentioned on a page about the election. If this collection does not exist anywhere, then it is not notable and the curation here is WP:OR. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 18:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Politics, and Canada. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 18:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Andersson (musician)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Due to numerous aliases and associations with various names that are in fact themselves and "bands" that are made up of only the musician, notability is almost impossible to find. In keeping with the page Raison d'être (band) (also up for AfD), which lists only the BLP, both pages seem to be promotional in content. All sources are primary.

Delete. WP:BEFORE doesn't find anything useful. Better still, speedy delete per WP:A7. There is no credible claim of notability made here. If the band article is kept, this title should be redirected there. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:55, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Music. Maineartists (talk) 18:55, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:33, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as A7. No credible claim of significance. C F A 💬 20:29, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Email loop

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Email loops existed, and could even recur, but they are, essentially, a configuration error. I am not convinced that there is an encyclopaedic subject here though. The encyclopaedic subject is presumably email, or mail servers. What is on this page is almost entirely unsourced. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 18:08, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Internet. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 18:08, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Iceberg Vodka

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page is a slightly spammy product description of a vodka product. The only claim to notability is an unsourced one that it won the 2006-07 Golden Icon Award for Best Vodka. But what is this award? There is an eponymous entertainment award, but searching for an award by this name for vodka only leads to this product. The page claims this is the Travolta Family Entertainment award, which is not the same, as far as I can tell, as the show business award. Travolta Family Entertainment is a quickly abandoned trademark [1], and I suspect the award was invented so that it could be given to this vodka. Certainly no evidence to the contrary. If that is correct, this is unashamed product spam. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 17:51, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising and Products. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 17:51, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Canada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:35, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Totalitär

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NBAND. Some mentions in Swedish newspaper archives but no significant coverage. AlexandraAVX (talk) 17:44, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Music, and Sweden. AlexandraAVX (talk) 17:44, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Separation (band)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NBAND. Some coverage in Swedish newspaper archives but nothing significant about the band itself. AlexandraAVX (talk) 17:40, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Music, and Sweden. AlexandraAVX (talk) 17:40, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noah Holcomb

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose the deletion of the Wikipedia article on Noah Holcomb for the following reasons:

Lack of Notability:

According to Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines, a topic is presumed notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Upon thorough research, Noah Holcomb does not meet this criterion. The available sources primarily consist of minor mentions and local coverage, which do not constitute significant coverage. Insufficient Reliable Sources:

The sources cited in the article do not meet the standard of reliable, secondary sources. Most of the references are primary sources or lack the editorial oversight needed to be considered reliable. There is a scarcity of independent coverage from reputable media outlets, academic publications, or other authoritative sources. Failure to Meet Sports Notability Criteria:

For athletes, Wikipedia's Sports Notability Guidelines specify that individuals should have achieved significant success in major international competitions at the highest level. Noah Holcomb has not been documented to have such achievements. His sports career, as detailed in the article, does not include any significant milestones that would warrant notability under these guidelines. Verifiability and Independence Issues:

Wikipedia's Verifiability Policy requires that all content must be verifiable and based on reliable sources. Much of the information in the article lacks independent verification and appears to be derived from sources closely associated with Holcomb, thereby compromising the objectivity required for a Wikipedia article. Consensus from the Community:

Previous discussions and evaluations by the Wikipedia community have highlighted similar concerns regarding the subject's notability. There has been a consistent lack of support for maintaining the article due to the reasons mentioned above. Given these points, I believe the article on Noah Holcomb does not meet Wikipedia's standards for inclusion. I recommend deletion to maintain the quality and reliability of the encyclopedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiUserExplorer23 (talk • contribs) 23:09, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 August 12. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:27, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Cycling, California, and Iowa. Skynxnex (talk) 16:39, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails SPORTBASIC/GNG. Couldn't find any significant coverage at all. Though I recommend the nominator not use ChatGPT to generate their comments in the future. C F A 💬 20:33, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2014 Acceleration at Portimão

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominated for this same reason

I appreciate this article creator's enthusiasm in the hope that Wikipedia will help to make it notable but editors should be advised of notability guidelines before creating. In this case, can it meet notability guidelines? No, unfortunately. Like everything in Acceleration 2014, nothing there meets notability guidelines.

Unneeded WP:CFORK that is solely useful to the tiniest minorities of dedicated fans, thats if they exist, and is too over reliant on WP:PRIMARY as having checked via WP:BEFORE, this brought in nothing. All the rounds are group together in this nomination for this same reason. What all those articles have in common is that they all fail WP:GNG, as well as having poor level of WP:SIGNIFICANCE and WP:EVENTCRIT, having lasted only a single season. Also, WP:NOSTATS and WP:NSPORTSEVENT, having being a racing series by anybody other than the most ardent fans who may come and fight for a keep vote. SpacedFarmer (talk) 15:47, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsport-related deletion discussions. SpacedFarmer (talk) 15:47, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:56, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I appreciate this article creator's enthusiasm in the hope that Wikipedia will help to make it notable – What? What gives you this idea? Can you at least try not to disparage content creators, as you seem to do in every AfD nomination you make? Seriously, it's ridiculous that you cannot seem to help but put others down in your nominations. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:12, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sujan Singh (contractor)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NBIO; all sources that provide WP:SIGCOV are authored by family members of the subject. (The article was also created by an apparent COI editor, now blocked, with a track record of creating a WP:WALLEDGARDEN of articles about their family members.) Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:41, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and India. Shellwood (talk) 14:49, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom. Fails WP:BASIC. C F A 💬 16:59, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Pakistan, Delhi, and Punjab. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:36, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Resmi R Nair

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am curious about how this person meets WP:GNG criteria. This article does not appear to satisfy the necessary guidelines for notability.The only reliable citation in this article pertains to the news of this person arrest in a sex racket.But this incident alone does not contribute to her notability or prominence.This article was previously deleted thrugh AFD Disscusion. Padavalam🌂 ► 14:14, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, India, and Kerala. Padavalam🌂 ► 14:14, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This appears to be a clear case of WP:BLP1E. The sources that come close to being significant only cover their arrest related to the online racket. I can’t find any other independent sources with significant coverage of the subject, so it fails to meet WP:GNG. I would like to hear the author’s comments on this article; perhaps they can provide significant coverage of the subject beyond the racket case. If they succeed, the subject might pass GNG. GrabUp - Talk 14:32, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I had created this for her career as a model, she was also instrumental in establishing the Kiss of Love protest. The arrest was secondary. I assumed the Kiss of Love protest was what made her notable for wikipedia here. Oaktree b (talk) 14:48, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no doubt that the Kiss of Love protest was significant, and she played a central role in it. However, does that make her inherently notable? I am unable to find significant coverage of her in articles related to the protest. GrabUp - Talk 14:55, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:GNG, per nom. Charliehdb (talk) 15:07, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gazetted officer (Kenya)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A gazetted officer simply means a government employee whose appointment gets notified in the Gazette. I don't think it warrants a standalone article, WP:PAGEDECIDE. Article is also uncited and not received WP:SIGCOV with only single reference, which is barely reliable (fails WP:RS). Hence, looks like article is made out of original research. TheProEditor11 (talk) 12:24, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Kenya. TheProEditor11 (talk) 12:24, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Kenya Gazette. the content is unsourced but sources exist that show the term is in use [2] [3]. But this article would be merely a definition; discussing it at Kenya Gazette is sufficient. Walsh90210 (talk) 01:49, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:11, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hikmat Zaid

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is highly promotion and extremely non neutral. It does use sources for some material but other material is extremely lacking in basic citations. Some sources cite to sources that are, in my opinion, not reliable at all. Others are to Fatah or Fatah-related organizations for which the subject was a non-trivial member and therefore not independent.

Created by a COI contributor and previously draftified and disputed. Creator has now been blocked for sockpuppetry for trying to deceive the connection they have had to the subject, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abul7ik/Archive#10 August 2024. I understand that, given the COI, this could still be sent back to AfC but, given the block, I think that would be a round-about way of just {{g13}}ing the draft.

I also think this article is on the cusp of being {{g11}}ed but I may be biased given that my previous attempts to aid in fixing the draft have clearly been met in bad faith. I think any attempt to add maintenance tags would double the size of the article. My opinion is that it exists solely to promote the subject, and there is valid justification for a TNT deletion here. Bobby Cohn (talk) 13:44, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, and Palestine. Bobby Cohn (talk) 13:44, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and stubify. He meets NPOL as a member of the Palestinian Legislative Council (I checked, it's verifiable here). The entire article is obviously written by AI (scores 100% on GPTZero) so it should be trimmed down to a stub that can be expanded neutrally and verifiably. I have also tagged all the images for dated deletion on Commons because they are clearly not the uploader's own work. C F A 💬 15:44, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Certainly notable, but likely needs WP:TNTing due to the amount of AI used. Curbon7 (talk) 21:27, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gamaji Bhangare

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:CASTE cruft bio created by IP socks of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thakor Sumant Sinhji Jhala. First tried to hijack Gamaliel when that failed started this page through another IP hop. Gotitbro (talk) 10:22, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups, History, Military, India, and Maharashtra. Gotitbro (talk) 10:22, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG. I can not verify any sources except for one but that is not on the subject of this page. RangersRus (talk) 14:02, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Although the article is not properly written but it meets the WP:GNG and WP:V per the cited sources.2409:4051:38B:9FBC:2307:730F:F39B:ED93 (talk) 03:14, 11 August 2024 (UTC)— 2409:4051:38B:9FBC:2307:730F:F39B:ED93 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Keep: article is related to the Maratha Army of the Maratha empire that ruled northern India from 1600_1800 and also meets Verifiability.195.170.172.189 (talk) 00:51, 12 August 2024 (UTC)— 195.170.172.189 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 13:29, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails GNG. One trivial mention in this journal (with the same text as this book). Nothing else. Although weirdly a mention apparently appears in The Wikipedia Revolution (Andrew Lih, 2009) but the contents are unavailable on Google Books so I'm not sure why. C F A 💬 16:03, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Channel North Television

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources. Fails WP:N. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 12:00, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and New Zealand. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 12:00, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect to List of free-to-air channels in New Zealand (though it is not mentioned there). There's this article but nothing outside of that. Fails GNG. C F A 💬 15:25, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: or redirect to the list in see also (as CFA suggests). Sources (one mentioned by CFA): https://www.nzherald.co.nz/northern-advocate/news/northland-tv-station-channel-north-revived/Y5COCFVXAAK7HQJEB25CVY5X3A/#google_vignette ; https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/51604/regional-tv-channel-'facing-certain-death' for example -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 20:04, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fear Factor India

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NTV. M S Hassan (talk | contributions) 10:49, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:11, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Khatron Ke Khiladi (TV series) -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 20:08, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Khatron Ke Khiladi (TV series) Next time do the most bare minimum of WP:BEFORE please, including reading the lede of this article where the suggested target is linked within it. A series with fourteen seasons certainly meets GNG/NTV. Also please update your signature to link to your current, not your former, username. Nate • (chatter) 20:28, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kodagu University

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed draftification. The university appears to exist because Google can find details. All the references are primary sources, none of them (currently) is able to be opened for verification. Lacks references which are significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources. Fails WP:V. Has potential to be incubated in Draft. Most assuredly not ready for mainspace. As presented fails WP:GNG 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 10:14, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Karnataka. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:36, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I am only able to find routine coverage with many passing mentions from a WP:BEFORE search. There are some reliable sources that are independent, but they are mostly announcements. These sources will likely fail the WP:SIRS check. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 13:57, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: my BEFORE source assessment matches those of Jeraxmoira and Timtrent, but I fall on the idea this won't meet the GNG or NSCHOOL. Bobby Cohn (talk) 14:51, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Aeromar destinations

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NOT, WP:NCORP, plain logic

Logic is failed because this is a largely a list of places that Aeromar wasn't flying to in January 2023, as is indicated by the overwhelming majority of them being listed as "terminated". Since all of the destinations that were active in January 2023 are mentioned on the Aeromar page, this page is redundant. Anyone asserting that these "terminated" destinations are of historical interest needs to show historical (i.e., historical journal, history book etc.) interest for that.

WP:NOT is failed because this is a complete listing of the services of a company. As such it is excluded under WP:NOTCATALOG no. 6 which states that "Listings to be avoided include [...] products and services". It is also an indiscriminate listing - all destinations ever flown to, however briefly, are listed without any attempt to summarise them which is against WP:IINFO.

WP:NCORP (which applies to the services of companies as well as the companies themselves) is failed because none of the sources here are independent, third-party, reliable sources. This article is entirely sourced either to the company website or to run-of-the-mill articles based on company press-releases and statements and trade-press coverage or local-news failing WP:AUD. Additionally, many of the links are 404, making them fail verifiability. Sources that clearly pass WP:ORGIND are needed, but none are present nor could I find any. FOARP (talk) 10:13, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Aviation. FOARP (talk) 10:13, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Travel and tourism, Lists, and Mexico. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:37, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOT. Orientls (talk) 15:54, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

X64dbg

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability, sources are primary or passing mentions, notability tag removed without improvements. Fram (talk) 10:11, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:11, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chronic airway-digestive inflammatory disease

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is one source in this very old stub, and that is to a self help book that coined this term. I found it mentioned just a few times by similarly non medical texts, e.g. [4] which is about fitness and diet. Scholar comes up blank. Medical texts do not recognize this. The page lacks WP:MEDRS because they don't exist. At best this is a syndrome and not a disease, but as it stands there is no subject here. The opening claim appears fringe and has been unsourced for 17 years. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 09:28, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Medicine. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 09:28, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Made-up syndrome by one set of authors selling their cure. This text in the article definitely takes it into fringe land CAID can also impact organs beyond the respiratory (breathing) and digestive systems. Heart disease, stroke, infertility, painful headaches and chronic fatigue syndrome may be linked to CAID. Search finds discussion of some connections between some respiratory and GI illnesses, but nothing approaching a defined syndrome or the claims in this article. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 13:03, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Textbook nonexistent diagnosis conjured up by alt-med quacks. Not one mention in Google Scholar (!) let alone any reputable database; only mentions on the open web are this article, WP mirrors, and the book by the authors cited in the article (the only reference). User who created the page has 2 edits, both to this article. There is a real diagnosis called CAID (chronic atrial-intestinal dysrhythmia): [5] but it is unrelated. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:12, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bhajpa Ki Baat

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:WEBSITE, Some non-reliable sources in this article. Youknow? (talk) 08:29, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Websites, India, and Delhi. Youknow? (talk) 08:29, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I agree with the nominator. I searched for independent, reliable sources with in-depth coverage of the subject but couldn’t find any. The article relies on unreliable sources, and I was also unable to find any Hindi sources. The article fails to meet WP:NWEB and WP:GNG. Please ping me if anyone finds significant coverage from reliable sources about the subject. GrabUp - Talk 08:37, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Poor sources on the page with mostly primary source of subject's own political news website. Lacks indepth coverage and secondary independent reliable sources. Page is also for WP:PROMO and advertising purpose. RangersRus (talk) 13:09, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pandit Pawan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG or WP:NPOL, There is no Indepth coverage. Most of the sources are user generated, not reliable sources, (WP:RS). Notion Press, Goodreads.com, Gaana. etc. All these are non-reliable sources. Youknow? (talk) 08:26, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, Politics, India, and Haryana. Youknow? (talk) 08:26, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Most sources on the page are poor, primary and unreliable. I cannot find subject's work that has made a significant impact and achievement (nationally or internationally) and demonstrated by secondary independent reliable sources. RangersRus (talk) 13:18, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:GNG and most of the sources are unreliable. Charliehdb (talk) 15:24, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom C F A 💬 16:14, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article fails WP:GNG, there is no significant coverage in enough reliable secondary sources MohReddy (talk) 22:22, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Embassy of Burundi, London

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No secondary sources. Fails WP:GNG. Very little content, effectively a directory listing. AusLondonder (talk) 08:17, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Organizations, and United Kingdom. AusLondonder (talk) 08:17, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:ORG. No third party coverage. LibStar (talk) 09:55, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails GNG. Checked newspapers.com and Google Books. No significant coverage anywhere. C F A 💬 16:29, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nellore Airport

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Always been a proposed airport, no developments. Appears to be TOOSOON. Can be recreated if the airport actually reaches construction or approval stages. Thewikizoomer (talk) 07:56, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and India. jlwoodwa (talk) 08:49, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:38, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The "proposed" project is still going through designs, plans, bids, contracts, budget, approvals and is too early to warrant a standalone Page on this airport. Case of WP:TOOSOON and not notable as of yet. RangersRus (talk) 12:58, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: WP:TOOSOON and fails WP:GNG. Charliehdb (talk) 15:27, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bret Kamwi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article doesn't meet WP:NAUTHOR and WP:ACTOR. At most impact, for directing a quite significantly covered play, I won't have at prejudice with redirecting to List of Namibian writers. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 13:46, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Authors, ~~Lists of people~~, and Africa. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 13:48, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:41, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomad (eSIM)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe this article fails WP:NPRODUCT as the subject doesn't appear to have received sustained coverage in reliable independent secondary sources. Available sources seem to be either reviews that fail WP:PRODUCTREV, primary, or superficial mentions.

Most of the article is actually about how eSIMs work. A brief mention of this product is already given on LotusFlare, the company which runs Nomad. Ligaturama (talk) 07:39, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Technology. Ligaturama (talk) 07:39, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can only find sponsored reviews (e.g. [6][7][8] ) and trivial mentions. May be notable in the future but fails GNG at the moment. C F A 💬 16:18, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not a notable product/service --𝕒𝕥𝕠𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕕𝕣𝕒𝕘𝕠𝕟𝟙𝟛𝟞 🗨️ 🖊️ 16:19, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2014 Bangladesh-Myanmar border skirmish

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This type of skirmish is not uncommon in the region. The event had no lasting historical significance, and Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Worldbruce (talk) 06:52, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, Bangladesh, and Myanmar. Worldbruce (talk) 06:52, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. ~ Deloar Akram (Talk • Contribute) 07:22, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:38, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beykoz Arena

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication this stadium proposed more than 10 years ago was ever built. Google search returns a place of the same name which hosts pigeon racing. The club which supposedly will have a home at this stadium plays elsewhere, and according to their page here, have only played amateur competitions since 2011. C 679 04:47, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Turkey. C 679 04:47, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. C 679 04:50, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is Beykoz Stadyumu (stadium) with a 3k capacity, [9], however Arena? Besides, this is way below the threshold, delete per nom. Govvy (talk) 10:23, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sandy Hook, Indiana

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A spot NE of Jackson Pond where the road goes one way and the railroad the other after running in parallel for some distance. Beyond that I have nothing except the one year post office, which is never a good sign. Mangoe (talk) 04:27, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:39, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Institute of Science and Technology, Bangladesh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable educational institution. No independent, reliable sources could be found in English or Bengali that contain significant coverage of it, so there should not be a stand alone article on the topic. I had previously redirected it to List of institutes in Bangladesh, but was reverted by the author, an alumnus. Worldbruce (talk) 03:47, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Bangladesh. Worldbruce (talk) 03:47, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:01, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All Israel News

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has been dumped on the top of the list of Israeli newspapers, yet this is a platform that fails NCORP. I will go ahead and remove it from the list of Israeli newspapers. A connection to the JPost was suggested yet remains totally unclear. gidonb (talk) 03:46, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Companies, and Israel. gidonb (talk) 03:46, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:01, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails NCORP. No significant coverage in independent sources. C F A 💬 16:32, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Waipareira

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable electorate that only briefly existed for 3 years. No independent secondary coverage appears to exist. Can be mentioned elsewhere like the Te Atatu electorate. Traumnovelle (talk) 03:36, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and New Zealand. Traumnovelle (talk) 03:36, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose You are joking, aren't you? How can an electorate not be notable? Electorates are unique (hence, a merger is inappropriate); they form the basis for electorate seats. There is no way that you'd see an electorate deleted and I encourage you to withdraw this nomination. Schwede 66 05:41, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is no subject specific notability for electorates. I did not see any reliable SIGCOV at first although I have found one source now: [10] Traumnovelle (talk) 05:47, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep this electorate is significant within the New Zealand context for having only lasted one election.NealeWellington (talk) 11:11, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep electorates are generally clearly notable for many different reasons. Not seeing an argument against here. SportingFlyer T·C 15:22, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The argument is a lack of independent reliable sources providing significant coverage, therefore no GNG. Traumnovelle (talk) 19:02, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The significant sources would have been in 1995 and 1996, and as we all know, that is a period for which there are scant online sources available. PapersPast stops at 1989, and The New Zealand Herald has an online archive going back to about 2000. There's hardly anything in between. That the sources aren't online does not mean that they do not exist. Schwede 66 21:15, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Auckland Library has sources which have blurbs/briefs catalogued in the National Library website. Traumnovelle (talk) 22:07, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Incident management (ITSM)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails general notability guideline. ltb d l (talk) 03:23, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Management, and Technology. C F A 💬 03:58, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the article sounds like a WP:DICTIONARY definition Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 05:59, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge: with Incident management. Tule-hog (talk) 02:31, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:07, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alexis Tomassian

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

nonnotable voice actor - Altenmann >talk 03:43, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and France. jlwoodwa (talk) 05:11, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I'm trying to evaluate WP:ENT, but Alexis Tomassian § Filmography is pretty misleading; for instance, Tomassian did not voice Zuko in A:TLA, but rather in its French dub. The best I can find so far is voicing the main characters of Martin Mystery and The Podcats, and the latter's notability is questionable. jlwoodwa (talk) 06:17, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
He also voiced Samson in Calamity, a Childhood of Martha Jane Cannary; he's listed as the third star, and a review describes Samson as the plot's initial catalyst. That looks like a significant role to me. jlwoodwa (talk) 18:38, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not a significant coverage of Tomassian. In fact, not a mum about him. Notability not inherited - Altenmann >talk 18:43, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'll paraphrase the part of WP:ENT that applies here: An actor or voice actor may be considered notable if they have had significant roles in multiple notable films or television shows. That's from a subject-specific notability guideline. "Significant coverage" has nothing to do with that – it's only in WP:GNG. I also don't see your point with WP:INHERIT – that section names SNGs as a case where notability can be inherited. jlwoodwa (talk) 22:05, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see, thanks for clarification. Still, I fail to see "initial catalyst" is "significant role": Samson is covered in a single sentence. If a role is significant, surely it deserves more than that. About INHERIT, thanks again, I stand corrected. - Altenmann >talk 22:13, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The review's pretty sparse on plot in general, and Samson's one sentence is more than any other (non-main) character gets. Calamity, a Childhood of Martha Jane Cannary § Plot goes into more detail, and he's mentioned in 9 sentences there (mostly as "the soldier", but that's unambiguous). jlwoodwa (talk) 23:08, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to be obnoxious, but one needs an independent source that describes character's role as "significant" or similar, otherwise it is Wikipedian's opinion/original research. In the case of Calamity, I inclined to believe, because imdb say "starring Salomé Boulven Alexandra Lamy Alexis Tomassian", implying these are major roles, but unfortunately imdb is not a valid ref for wikipedia. OK. I'm done being obnoxious here. :-) - Altenmann >talk 23:41, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that notability needs to be based on reliable sources, but we're never going to get a reliable source to directly support a claim that "this subject is wikinotable". That's probably why WP:NOR's lead says it doesn't apply to deletion discussions. jlwoodwa (talk) 06:28, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Red herring. Strawman. Muddy waters. Don't give it to me. We need a source which supports our requirement for notability. In this case we need sources which imply that the actor had "significant roles in multiple notable films or television shows". And this must acceptable for the article, not for AfD bickering. - Altenmann >talk 07:43, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What are you talking about? It's not a red herring. WP:NOR literally states that This policy does not apply to talk pages and other pages which evaluate article content and sources, such as deletion discussions or policy noticeboards. Can you explain why you think we need those particular sources, given that WP:NOR does not apply? jlwoodwa (talk) 09:02, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nonsense. You cannot base article content on non-reliable sources. Just the same, you cannot judge subject notability basing on self-published sources. Are you seriously telling me that if actor's mom says that her boy is the greatest actor, then we write a Wikipedia article about him? AfD discussions routinely judge sources, and WP:NOR has nothing to do with this. - Altenmann >talk 16:21, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am not telling you that. I don't know why you'd think I'm telling you that. As I said before, I agree that notability needs to be based on reliable sources. I'm only objecting to your statement that one needs an independent source that describes character's role as "significant" or similar, otherwise it is Wikipedian's opinion/original research. jlwoodwa (talk) 19:47, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am not objecting that a certain degree of "original research" is necessary in AfD discussions: of course, judging sources is kinda "original research", but this kind of Wikipedian's opinion about sources is everywhere in Wikipedia, and it is not really original research. I see we are in the same page here, so never mind. - Altenmann >talk 20:13, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to Donaldd23's improvements, Zombillenium now looks notable, and a review describes Steven (Tomassian's character) for three sentences. jlwoodwa (talk) 23:29, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, interesting discussion but we need some firm opinions on what should happen with this article and so far, I don't see any other than the nominator's. As for sources, I've seen dozens of actors' bios at AFD and "significant role" is typically judged not by a reliable source that says, exactly, that an actor's role was significant but by whether their character is listed as a main character in the film information. But there have been successful arguments that some supporting roles are also significant so there is an element of subjectivity involved.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:37, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Liz summarized the discussion correctly: we need sources that the actor had significant role, i.e., they were either among main characters (no further sources needed) or among supporting roles which were somehow noted by critics (e.g. award for "best supporting role" (but in the latter case it is for notability anyway), or other mentions, eg I saw statements that this or that secondary role unexpectedly rose to prominence in a film due to actor's extraordinary acting). - Altenmann >talk 03:10, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- <sigh> I have to go against my own nom, since nobody else bothers: Tomassian voiced Kaworu Nagisa (in French dubbing), definitely among main chars. - Altenmann >talk 03:21, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Again, what should happen with this article?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:42, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

American Liberty University

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable institution. An unaccredited university, with no independent sources. No longer approved to operate [11]. The only independent coverage is a few message boards saying it is a "scam". Walsh90210 (talk) 02:35, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and California. Walsh90210 (talk) 02:35, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Non-notable educational institution, few if any sources, not even anything saying how good or bad it is as an institution of higher learning. Oaktree b (talk) 02:39, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:12, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

University of the East College of Computer Studies and Systems

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of the East College of Computer Studies and System closed as merge to University of the East and this was subsequently recreated so bringing it back here for broader discussion and merger restoration, if deemed appropriate. I am unable to find independent sourcing for this college. Star Mississippi 02:10, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Education, Schools, and Philippines. Star Mississippi 02:10, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:03, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pet Sitters International

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence PSI meets N:ORG. A membership organization & trade association whose coverage is mostly non independent and definitely not in depth. Star Mississippi 02:07, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal, Organizations, Companies, and North Carolina. Star Mississippi 02:07, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
1. Costello, Jane (1999-09-02). "With Two Pet-Sitting Groups, Naturally Things Turn Catty". The Wall Street Journal. p. B1. ProQuest 398712141.
  The article notes: "After a series of catfights, Ms. Moran left NAPPS in 1993 and set up a rival organization, Pet Sitters International. The sponsor of Take Your Dog to Work Day, PSI now has 2,900 members, who pay $80 in annual dues. Through a correspondence school, PSI members can also apply to become an "Accredited Pet Sitting Technician" for $299. With further training, and another $179, there's the title "Advanced Pet Sitting Technician." For another $50, there's "Master Pet Sitting Professional." At PSI's conference in New Orleans next week, topics will include the "untapped market" for midday dog-walking and ways to avoid professional burnout. While PSI has accumulated the lion's share of pet sitters, NAPPS has recruited 1,200 members ..."
2. Sturiale, Jeanne (2004-03-19). "King Woman Is a Leader in the Field of Pet-Sitting - Members Accredited to Visit Pets in Homes". Winston-Salem Journal. Archived from the original on 2024-08-12. Retrieved 2024-08-12.
  The article notes: "About 10 years ago, Patti Moran founded Pet Sitters International Inc. to encourage professionalism in the emerging field of in-home pet care. Since then, Pet Sitters International, a for-profit association in King, has grown to more than 6,000 members in nine countries, with members ranging from one-person shops to companies with 125 pet sitters on staff. ... After Moran sold her pet-sitting business in 1993, friends encouraged her to start an association. A year later, she formed Pet Sitters International. ... Moran wouldn't reveal profits, but, with annual member dues of $99, Pet Sitters International's sales exceed $500,000 a year."
3. Daniel, Fran (2014-04-06). "A furry friend's safe haven. Globe pet-sitting association began in Triad" (pages 1 and 2). Winston-Salem Journal. Archived from the original (pages 1 and 2) on 2024-08-12. Retrieved 2024-08-12 – via Newspapers.com.
  The article notes: "Patti Moran's love for dogs. cats and other pets morphed from a petting-sitting business into an international pet-sitting association based in King. Founded in 1994, Pet Sitters International is an educational organization for professional pet sitters. The association has 7,000 members, of which 331 are based in 30 countries outside the United States, including Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, Japan and Brazil. For the past 20 years, the association has focused on helping people start their own professional pet-sitting services by offering access to pet-sitter specific business and educational resources, as well as educating pet owners about the importance of choosing "quality pet-care providers.""
4. Caldwell, Neill (2019-11-06). "King-based worldwide organization celebrates 25 years". The Stokes News. Archived from the original on 2024-08-12. Retrieved 2024-08-12.
  The article notes: "Pet Sitters International celebrated that 25th anniversary this past weekend during its annual World Educational Conference. Patti Moran is the founder and is considered a pioneer — not just for Pet Sitters International but for an entire industry that didn’t really exist until she envisioned it. The organization was started in Winston-Salem, but the Morans moved to King 22 years ago. ... In 1994, Moran founded Pet Sitters International (PSI). ... PSI began publishing the first magazine for professional pet sitters, now called Pet Sitter’s World. Moran and PSI also established Professional Pet Sitters Week, now a recognized, annual observance around the globe. The organization also promotes pet adoption, has an awards program, an online store and offers its members certifications and bonding. It is the world’s largest educational association for professional pet sitters and dog walkers."
5. Duea, Angela Williams (2008). How To Open & Operate a Financially Successful Pet Sitting Business. Ocala, Florida: Atlantic Publishing. pp. 34, 223–224. ISBN 978-1-60138-229-0. Retrieved 2024-08-12 – via Internet Archive.
  The book notes on page 34: " Pet Sitters International (PSI) offers pet sitters an accreditation program to sharpen their professional skills. An in-depth educational program teaches pet sitters about pet care, health and nutrition, business management, office procedures, and additional services. The top pet sitting professionals in the industry have worked together to develop this coursework. While you can gain this knowledge in other places, such as by reading this book, PSI offers accreditation for students completing this coursework. Your clients will know that by hiring an accredited sitter, they are assured of hiring a professional with in-depth knowledge and skills in caring for pets and a good knowledge of modern pet-care practices. To become accredited, the pet sitter has to learn and exhibit a working knowledge of taking care of many types of animals and running an efficient business."
  The book notes on pages 223–224: "Pet Sitters International is dedicated to educating professional pet sitters and promoting, supporting, and recognizing excellence in pet sitting. This professional association offers pet sitters an accreditation program to sharpen their professional skills. An in-depth educational program teaches business management, office procedures, and additional services. The top pet-sitting professionals in the industry have worked together to develop this coursework."
There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Pet Sitters International to pass Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Primary criteria, which requires "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject".
Cunard (talk) 08:01, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As always, thanks for the sources @Cunard, 5 was new to me but I'm not sure 1-4 are suitably independent as the blurbs are lifted from versions of their site which makes me think they're re-prints of press releases and other communications from Moran. Maybe the depth will end up being there given their history but I"ve not yet found it. Will keep looking too. Star Mississippi 12:12, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Masahiko Nakahira

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No source was found either within the article or outside the article that meet notability. 日期20220626 (talk) 01:34, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: There's some coverage in this, a RS [12], but it's not enough coverage for an article. That's all I can find. Oaktree b (talk) 02:36, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Anime and manga, and Japan. CptViraj (talk) 03:47, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A Pair of Aces

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has been tagged for sources since September 2022. The only sources on the page are for Goodreads (unreliable per WP:GOODREADS) and a "review" that ultimately directs the user to Amazon. According to the page, the text was never published, and I have not been able to find any sources on the subject. Given that there are two authors, the option to redirect is out. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:07, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:04, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nothing useful found. PARAKANYAA (talk) 05:40, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Persikad 1999

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a G4, but no indication factors have changed since the prior AfD. A redirect to Liga 3 (Indonesia) is likely not helpful to the reader as teams aren't mentioned there. Star Mississippi 00:45, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports, Football, and Indonesia. Star Mississippi 00:45, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:04, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:52, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Raiter

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Last AfD was 7 months ago and no consensus. I still believe he fails WP:BIO and WP:AUTHOR. There is no inherent notability in any of the roles he has had. LibStar (talk) 00:21, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and Australia. LibStar (talk) 00:21, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Melbourne School of Theology: As was proposed last time, seems fine to me. I don't see much additional coverage. Oaktree b (talk) 02:41, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Pakistan, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:05, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dog Puller

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems overly advertisal and also doesn't seem especially notable. Lastly, I am suspicious of the sources. TanRabbitry (talk) 04:13, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal, Sports, and Ukraine. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:22, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]