Wikipedia talk:Legal disclaimer

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Legal disclaimer page.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

	This page is within the scope of the Wikipedia Help Project, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's help documentation for readers and contributors. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. To browse help related resources see the Help Menu or Help Directory. Or ask for help on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you there.Wikipedia HelpWikipedia:Help ProjectTemplate:Wikipedia Help ProjectHelp articles
Top	This page has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

YOU MIGHT BE ON THE WRONG PAGE.
This page is not meant for general questions, nor discussions about specific articles.
This page is only for discussions about the Wikipedia page Wikipedia:Legal disclaimer. To discuss an article, please use that article's talk page. To ask for help with using and editing Wikipedia, use our Teahouse. Alternatively, see our FAQ.

Wikipedia:Legal disclaimer is permanently protected from editing because it is a page that should not be edited significantly for legal or other reasons. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit protected}} to notify an administrator to make the requested edit.

Wikipedia:Legal disclaimer is a reader-facing page intended for viewing by non-editors. Please prioritize their needs when adjusting its design, and move editor-facing elements to other pages.

Archives

1

Edit request 20 February 2016

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Add {{pp|small=yes}}. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:21, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done — xaosflux ^Talk 19:30, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request January 1 2020

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Since WP:NOLEGAL goes to this page, there should be a {{for}} notice at the top for WP:NLT Computer Fizz (talk) 10:00, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done, but with {{redirect}} which is the correct template for such cases. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:42, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jo-Jo Eumerus: To make it more clear, instead of putting WP:NLT you should put Wikipedia:No legal threats. I just put WP:NLT cause it takes less time to type, i didn't mean that as the exact text. Computer Fizz (talk) 04:39, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:05, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 25 January 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please change "Nothing on Wikipedia.org or of any project of Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., should be construed as an attempt to offer or render a legal opinion or otherwise engage in the practice of law." to "Nothing on Wikipedia or any Wikimedia Foundation project should be construed as an attempt to offer or render a legal opinion or otherwise engage in the practice of law.". JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 22:44, 25 January 2021 (UTC) JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 22:44, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why? If you are going to advocate changing a page, you should provide a reason to justify it. Mr248 (talk) 03:14, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mr248, The phrase "or of any project of Wikimedia Foundation, Inc" is phrased awkwardly. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 12:15, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. I don't feel comfortable making a content change like this to a page with legal considerations without a broader community discussion or review from the WMF. This wording has been in place since 2003. — The Earwig ^talk 20:01, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong statistics

Why is it that black people are more than whites in rustenburg but Afrikaans language marks more percentage of afrikaner speaking people this doesn't make sense, something needs to be said in a true manner for the coming generation to know of their province and city Gaborekwebogosi (talk) 01:57, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]