Jump to content

Ta Kung Pao

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ta Kung Pao
Hing Wai Centre, which has the Hong Kong head office of Ta Kung Pao
TypeDaily newspaper; state media
FormatBroadsheet
Owner(s)Hong Kong Ta Kung Wen Wei Media Group (subsidiary of Hong Kong Liaison Office)
Founder(s)Ying Lianzhi
EditorWong Wai-Keung
Founded17 June 1902
Political alignmentPro-Beijing camp
Websitewww.takungpao.com Edit this at Wikidata

Ta Kung Pao (simplified Chinese: 大公报; traditional Chinese: 大公報; pinyin: Dàgōng Bào; Jyutping: daai6 gung1 bou3; formerly L'Impartial in Latin-based languages) is the oldest active Chinese-language newspaper in China. Founded in Tianjin in 1902, the paper is state-owned, controlled by the Liaison Office of the Central Government after the Chinese Civil War.[1][2] It is widely regarded as a veteran pro-Beijing newspaper.[3][4] In 2016, it merged with Hong Kong newspaper Wen Wei Po.[5]

History

[edit]
The Tianjin Ta Kung Pao (then known as L'Impartial in Latin-based languages) from 1912

In the final years of the Qing dynasty, Ying Lianzhi, a Catholic Manchu aristocrat, founded the newspaper in Tianjin on 17 June 1902, in order to, "help China become a modern and democratic nation".[6] The paper put forward the slogan "Four Noes" (四不主義) in its early years, pledging to say "No" to all political parties, governments, commercial companies, and persons.[citation needed] It stood up to the repression at the time, openly criticising the Empress Dowager Cixi and reactionary leaders, and promoted democratic reforms, pioneering the use of written vernacular Chinese (baihua). Readership fell after the Xinhai Revolution in 1911 and Wang Zhilong [zh] bought it in 1916. Still, the newspaper was out of business by 1925 due to the lack of readership. On 1 September 1926, however, Wu Dingchang [zh]), Hu Zhengzhi, Zhang Jiluan [zh] re-established the newspaper in Tianjin.[7] With "no party affiliation, no political endorsement, no self-promotion, no ignorance" (不黨, 不賣, 不私, 不盲) as its motto, the newspaper's popularity quickly rose again because of its sharp political commentary, especially of the Japanese as the Second Sino-Japanese War began.

As the war raged on, the newspaper's staff fled to other cities, such as Shanghai, Hankou, Chongqing, Guilin and Hong Kong, to continue publishing, but local editions were abandoned as the Japanese captured more and more territory. After the war was won, Wong Wan San [zh], the chief editor, re-established the Shanghai edition on 1 November 1945, in the format and style of the old Shanghai edition. They had also planned to issue editions for other cities, including Guangzhou, but the Chinese Civil War forced this proposal to be shelved. Ta Kung Pao supported the Kuomintang at the beginning of the Civil War, but switched its sympathies to the Chinese Communist Party after the repression of intellectuals, hyper-inflation, and other violent purges of political opponents by the Kuomintang.[8]

In March 1948, the Hong Kong edition was re-established. A major newspaper during the Republican years, it continued to be influential after re-publication by Fei Yi Ming, the subsequent publisher in Hong Kong after 1949, as one of few newspapers that survived foreign invasion and civil war. In April 1952, the colonial authorities in Hong Kong tried the newspaper's proprietor, publisher, and its editor for violation of the Sedition Ordinance. Ta Kung Pao, along with the New Evening Post and Wen Wei Po, were charged with inciting an uprising by negatively reporting on the colonial authorities' response to a fire in Tung Tau Tsuen. As a result, Ta Kung Pao's leadership was fined, jailed, and ordered to cease reporting for six months.[8]

A mass demonstration began in 1953 after protesters became dissatisfied with the Hong Kong government following a fire in the Tung Tau squatter area. The government in Guangzhou began fundraising to support the protesters and decided to dispatch a relief delegation to Hong Kong on 1 March 1952. The trip was cancelled after opposition from the Hong Kong government, and protests began on the same day targeting the Hong Kong police. Wen Wei Po and other publications supporting the Chinese government produced frequent reports emphasising the Hong Kong government's neglect of the poor.[9] : 104–106  On March 5, New Evening Post, Wen Wei Po and Ta Kung Pao reprinted an editorial from People's Daily, the newspaper of the CCP Central Committee but removed references to "massacre of our countrymen" to avoid violating Hong Kong's Sedition Ordinance. However, the Hong Kong government accused the newspapers of sedition. Ta Kung Pao, its owner Fei Yiming and publisher Li Zongying received to nine and six months of prison sentence and fined a few thousand Hong Kong dollars.[9]: 108  The newspaper was also ordered to stop publishing for six months.[9]: 108 

Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai then issued a statement demanding Hong Kong to stop the prosecution. The British government told Hong Kong authorities days later to rescind the court sentence against Ta Kung Pao, its owner and its publisher, and the newspaper was allowed to publish again after 12 days of suspension.[9]: 109 

In January 2019, Ta Kung Pao published an article stating that a "secret envoy" of president Tsai Ing-wen had met with three Hong Kong localist camp activists from the pro-independence group Studentlocalism. However, the "secret envoy" was actually Su Yong-yao, a senior political reporter for Liberty Times, a Taiwanese newspaper. The article was in turn criticized by the Taiwanese presidential office as "ridiculous" and "a piece of fake news".[10]

During the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests, Ta Kung Pao published antisemitic George Soros conspiracy theories, displaying Soros as a reptile in collusion with Jimmy Lai.[11] In 2020, Ta Kung Pao frequently attacked judges perceived as siding with pro-democracy protesters, causing Chief Justice Geoffrey Ma to make an 18-page plea against attacking judges and the judiciary system.[12] In November 2020, the Hong Kong Bar Association (HKBA) published a letter to Secretary of Justice Teresa Cheng, accusing Ta Kung Pao of publishing false material that claimed judge Anderson Chow was being supportive of criminal activities.[12] The HKBA asked Teresa Cheng to protect the city's judges against false accusations.[12]

In May 2023, the newspaper attacked housing and urban planning NGO Liber Research Community, saying the NGO was "taking things out of context with groundless evidence."[13]

Organization

[edit]
Office of Ta Kung Pao located on Hennessy Road, Wan Chai

The paper is state-owned, controlled by the Liaison Office of the Central Government in Hong Kong.[14] The head office of Ta Kung Pao is located on Hennessy Road, Wan Chai, Hong Kong Island, with offices in mainland China, such as in Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin, Inner-Mongolia and Guangzhou.

The paper's Asia-Pacific head office is in Hing Wai Centre (興偉中心), Tin Wan, Aberdeen, Hong Kong. Its China head office is in Chaoyang District, Beijing.[15] Previously the head office was in Kodak House Phase 2 (柯達大廈二期), North Point, Hong Kong.[16]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ 大公報道歉:「習近平打出租」是假新聞. BBC News Chinese (in Chinese). 18 April 2013. Archived from the original on 21 April 2013. Retrieved 17 February 2014.
  2. ^ "Hong Kong gov't orders pro-Beijing newspaper to remove giant sign on building following complaints". Hong Kong Free Press HKFP. 25 July 2019. Archived from the original on 29 October 2019. Retrieved 28 December 2019.
  3. ^ "Experts wary over news of China's 2nd carrier". Archived from the original on 23 June 2021. Retrieved 17 February 2014.
  4. ^ Roy, Denny (2 September 2019). "The blackest hand in Hong Kong is Beijing's". The Japan Times. Archived from the original on 14 September 2019. Retrieved 18 September 2019.
  5. ^ "Pro-Beijing newspapers Wen Wei Po and Ta Kung Pao to merge". Nikkei Asian Review. 2 February 2016. Archived from the original on 28 December 2019. Retrieved 28 December 2019.
  6. ^ Donald Paragon (1961) Ying Lien-Chih (1866–1926) and the Rise of Fu Jen, the Catholic University of Peking, Monumenta Serica, 20:1, 165-225, DOI: 10.1080/02549948.1961.11731012
  7. ^ McLaughlin, Timothy (9 September 2021). "How China Weaponized the Press". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 11 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
  8. ^ a b Zheng, Yangwen; Hong, Liu; Szonyi, Michael (2012). The Cold War in Asia: The Battle for Hearts and Minds. Brill. pp. 103, 108, 111.
  9. ^ a b c d Yan, Lu (2010). "Limits to Propaganda: Hong Kong's Leftist Media in the Cold War and Beyond". In Zheng, Yangwen; Liu, Hong; Szonyi, Michael (eds.). The Cold War in Asia: The Battle for Hearts and Minds. Leiden: Brill. pp. 95–118. ISBN 9789004175372.
  10. ^ "Hong Kong newspaper Ta Kung Pao slammed by Taiwanese presidential office for 'fake news'". Hong Kong Free Press. 17 January 2019. Archived from the original on 9 October 2019. Retrieved 18 September 2019.
  11. ^ Haime, Jordyn; Gering, Tuvia (25 April 2023). "How George Soros became China's perfect nemesis". The China Project. Archived from the original on 2 May 2023. Retrieved 19 August 2023.
  12. ^ a b c "Ta Kung Pao dragged in war over judicial independence|Chris Yeung". Apple Daily (in Chinese (Hong Kong)). Archived from the original on 23 June 2021. Retrieved 26 November 2020.
  13. ^ Chan, Irene (16 May 2023). "State-backed media take aim at Hong Kong housing and urban planning NGOs". Hong Kong Free Press. Archived from the original on 19 August 2023. Retrieved 24 May 2023.
  14. ^ Tse, Betsy (9 April 2015). "Basic Law violation seen as LOCPG tightens grip on HK publishers". EJ Insight. Archived from the original on 23 December 2015. Retrieved 9 April 2015.
  15. ^ "联络我们". Ta Kung Pao. Retrieved 31 March 2024. 亚太总部 香港 香港仔田灣海旁道7號興偉中心3樓[...]中国总部 北京市朝阳区亮马河南路14旁1门
  16. ^ "联系方式". Ta Kung Pao. Archived from the original on 7 June 2012. Retrieved 31 March 2024. 总社 香港北角健康东街三十九号柯达大厦二期
[edit]