Talk:Non-lock concurrency control
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There's another description of non-locking code at InterBase -- should we cross-link ?
Strictly-speaking, even optimistic concurrency control must lock at some point (during commit). Thus, I don't think it should qualify as a "non-lock concurrency control" mechanism. Daniel Spiewak (talk) 19:34, 1 October 2008 (UTC)