Jump to content

User talk:Ark~enwiki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to userland Ark! Oh, and to "sign" your name in talk pages, all you have to do is type three tildas (~) in a row and hit save (typing four ~'s will yield a link to your user page and the date). If you have any other questions, then drop me a line. Welcome aboard! --maveric149

Thanks again. Ark, Sunday, June 2, 2002

A Modest Proposal Alexander the Great Alice Miller Antiparticle Benjamin Spock Black American Bohm intepretation Bohm interpretation Cannabis Carthage Child abuse Child sacrifice Child sexual abuse Chirality Chomsky and anti-semitism Christian anti-Semitism Circumcision Civil war Copenhagen interpretation Cosmology Cosmology/Inflation Counterfactual definiteness Danny Dr Spock Early infanticidal childrearing Etemenanki Female genital mutilation Grand unification theory Gravitational singularity Helen Keller History Human rights Incest Incomplete dominance Infanticide Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics Large Scale Structure of the Cosmos Lloyd deMause M-theory Maglev Matter Milky Way Munchausen syndrome Neolithic childrearing Neutrino One child policy Physics Psychohistory Quantum entanglement Radiocarbon dating Roman Colosseum Science fiction author Solar neutrino problem Spanking Standard Model String theory Superstring theory Superstrings user:CYD user:Ed Poor user:Slrubenstein WIMP War on Terrorism

FYI: the software runs together lines separated only by a RETURN character; for a new paragraph, you need two returns in a row, which displays in the edit window as a blank line. Vicki Rosenzweig

Not sure what the problem was from you message on my talk page, but I can guess that you either forgot your password or the system doesn't recognize your password. Either way, I don't have that much access to the system to reset your password. However our local wikiware guru user:Brion VIBBER would at least be able to point you in the right direction. He will probably want to know what operating system and browser you are using and their versions (for example, I run Linux Mandrake with the Konqueror web browser and sometimes have to restart KDE (my GUI) to get the wikipedia cookie to work right). I hear Netscape and Mozzila also have issues with the wikipedia cookie. --maveric149

Maybe you're being too zealous in removing links? "See Also" links are harmless, I think. Plenty of existing articles contain them. -- CYD

Every link on a page costs the user's attention, distracting them from what's important. If the links are redundant, then they should be gone. If they're relevant then they should be made into proper paragraphs so the reader who sees them can judge whether or not to follow them.

I wrote some more about this on user:SolKarma

Incorporating the links into paragraphs is, I agree, the ideal solution. But failing that, "costing the user's attention" is probably not a very great problem - I doubt the average reader is so easily distracted. I think of "See Also" links as pointers about what still needs to be added into the articles; Wikipedia is a work in progress, after all. -- CYD

It's a different matter when the "see also" list makes up half of the article.

Crime against humanity

[edit]

As you added Hague to the article Crime against humanity perhapse you could answer my questions on Talk:Crime against humanity and amend the article if it needs it or remove my strike throught if the phrase is correct. PBS 12:32, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Notability of Brackish

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Brackish, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 172.131.255.238 13:20, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

[edit]

22:11, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

[edit]

10:37, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]