Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people who have not committed suicide

This page is an archive of the discussion surrounding the proposed deletion of the page entitled List of people who have not commited suicide.

This page is kept as an historic record.

The result of the debate was to delete the article.

The most ridiculous list of people I have seen here so far, as everyon not on List of people who commited suicide can be listed there. I was tempted to delete it by speedy deletion directly as being patent nonsense. andy 20:12, 27 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. I though it was quite funny :). Move to BJAODN and delete. Thue 20:19, 27 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. But it seems we might have a use for a List of people falsely thought to have commited suicide or some such. Rhymeless 20:25, 27 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Hahahaha. I haven't laughed like that since BJAODN:Bill Gates. I love this part, under self-sacrificers: The pilot in Air Force One movie who moved his plane in front of a missile to save the President. Delete, Bad Jokes. blankfaze | &#9835 20:27, 27 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
This is just dumb, and horribly incomplete. Delete. -- Cyrius|&#9998 20:31, May 27, 2004 (UTC)
Delete. BJAODN for sure. Andrewa 21:00, 27 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. anthony (see warning) 21:19, 27 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Absurd. There are some ridiculous lists outthere, but this is bizar. --Wyllium 22:05, 2004 May 27 (UTC)
Is this really any sillier than List of people? Meelar 22:30, 27 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
- No, but it's redundant to that list. anthony (see warning) 22:40, 27 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Hilarious, though. Everyking 22:35, 27 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Split into List of people whose non-suicidal cause of death is confirmed and List of people whose death is rumored not to have been suicide. Then delete both of those lists. Dpbsmith 22:56, 27 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
- Now those would be interesting lists. However delete this one. It's silly, but not particularly funny, so no BJAODN. Wile E. Heresiarch 23:34, 27 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
No reason to delete. Instead list on List of articles that have not been deleted by implosion... then delete - Tεxτurε 23:08, 27 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
- Last time I made a link like that, we ended up with Nude Wikipedia editing. -- Cyrius|&#9998 18:33, May 28, 2004 (UTC)
Delete, not even clever or funny. Fuzheado | Talk 23:39, 27 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
not funny. delete, do not move to BJAODN. --Jia ng 01:08, 28 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, BJAODN. -Etaoin 01:11, 28 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Oh come on Jiang and Fuzheado get a f***ing sense of humour! funny but should be Deleted Dainamo
- Wish I was as easily entertained. Delete. Average Earthman 17:52, 28 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Made me giggle. Now delete. — Chameleon 14:53, 28 May 2004 (UTC
Funny? Some people are easily amused... Delete. Denni 19:11, 2004 May 28 (UTC)
Redirect to list of famous alleged suicides, or delete. -Sean 00:31, 30 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete to BJAODN. Is funny - at least in terms of the section on people who have not committeed suicide because they are still alive (Which is just wonderfully random). Is also unencyclopedic. Snowspinner 00:57, 31 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
- It says something about the editor's perception of Sarah Jessica Parker that she's first on the list of people who have not yet commited suicide. Is that a statement in favor of her health and sanity... or against it? Hmmm. -Sean Curtin 06:12, 31 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
This is really funny, especially the "two categories". Remove from the main namespace, of course, but worth BJAODN'ing. V V 03:43, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Delete present content, but the page could be of interest if it listed people who were thought to have died by their own hand but didn't (i.e. 'the report of my death was greatly exaggerated' cases, people faking their death in order to escape custody or the courts). Rewrite suggested therefore. --VampWillow 19:43, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Delete, but this is definitely BJAODN material. The first category cracks me up. - DropDeadGorgias (talk) 22:13, Jun 1, 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue or the deletion should be placed on other relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.