Talk:Crossbow
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Crossbow article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Crossbow was a good article, but it was removed from the list as it no longer met the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. Review: December 24, 2006. |
"Prodd" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Prodd and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 14#Prodd until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 07:58, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Costs from crossbows compared to longbows
[edit]While nowadays the construction and material costs of crossbows seem to be as neglectable as those of longbows, it should definiteley be mentioned that the components of crossbows in medieval times were by order of magnitude higher in costs than those of (long-)bows. Even a simple trigger mechanism with only a handfull of metall parts could only be produced by specialists. Not to mention the later introduced steel bow, which not only demanded for specialists to produce but as well highly sophisticated skills in metallurgy. ciao --Pentaclebreaker (talk) 08:21, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
"Pitching" a bowstring?
[edit]In the lead, it says,
- ...an archer must maintain a bow's draw by pitching the bowstring with fingers, pulling it back with arm and back muscles...
Is this a legitimate technical term that this particular reader is not familiar with, or is it a typo? Should this be "pinching" or "grasping"? NapoliRoma (talk) 19:40, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
"Torque Bow" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]The redirect Torque Bow has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 7 § Torque Bow until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 05:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Information desert
[edit]I was looking for information about the performance envelope of crossbows compared to bows. Seems to me you got straight, reflex, and recurve bows, crossbows, and compound bows. How about a table comparing weight, (draw length), pull (force), range, energy, projectile speed, and rate of fire? Maybe even by date, since the technology of all of these weapons has improved compared to the bows and arrows of prehistoric times.98.17.181.251 (talk) 07:50, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Technology
- C-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Technology
- C-Class vital articles in Technology
- C-Class China-related articles
- High-importance China-related articles
- C-Class China-related articles of High-importance
- C-Class Chinese history articles
- High-importance Chinese history articles
- WikiProject Chinese history articles
- WikiProject China articles
- C-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- C-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- C-Class Medieval warfare articles
- Medieval warfare task force articles
- Delisted good articles