Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 May 8

< May 7	May 9 >

May 8

Category:Pesticide

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was rename. --Kbdank71 14:55, 15 May 2005 (UTC) Should be Category:Pesticides to match Category:Herbicides, Category:Fungicides, and Category:Insecticides - SimonP 22:36, May 8, 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Canadian companies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Kbdank71 14:55, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete my mistake, didn't find Category:Companies of Canada first--Hooperbloob 20:25, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Samaritan 22:52, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Republic of Singapore Navy naval bases

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was rename. --Kbdank71 14:55, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As discussed with User:Huaiwei in his talk page, a more appropriate category would be Category:Republic of Singapore Navy bases.

As I am unfamiliar with the rules here, I mistakenly de-populated Category:Republic of Singapore Navy naval bases and shifted the two articles in the old cateogory to a new category Category:Republic of Singapore Navy naval bases. I sincerely apologize for the mistake.

As it is a hassle to re-edit the articles, I was wondering if I could just let them be in the new category? If otherwise, I will revert back to the old category.

-Travisyoung 02:43, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Unless anyone can point out either (a) some naval bases not for the use of a navy, or (b) any navy bases that aren't naval, I don't see anything wrong with this suggestion. Grutness|^hello? 08:36, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Category:Republic of Singapore Navy naval bases, as agreed earlier. I actually forgot to list it here, until I saw travis listing it in speedy edit. :D--Huaiwei 09:58, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Complete move and delete former. James F. (talk) 14:56, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Canadian football (gridiron) players

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Kbdank71 14:55, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The category was ambiguous (did it categorize players of Canadian football or Canadian players of American football?) To resolve this, Category:Canadian football players and Category:Canadian American football players was created (consistent with category naming conventions in other sport), and thus this could be speedied. kelvSYC 19:15, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Samaritan 22:52, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
delete it's not ambiguous and is tidier - it categorizes Canadians who play either NFL football or CFL football, both gridiron. but i just noticed how Rugby League and Rugby union players get seperate cats and i do think american CFLers do deserve to be designated "canadian sportspeople", so the having two cats is useful too. a minor point but i think the word gridiron should be put into the two new cats though for the benefit of non-North Americans Mayumashu 05:44, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The latter is used within the text of category pages. For example, the text in Category:Canadian football players directs users to Category:Canadian soccer players, Category:Canadian American football players, or Category:Canadian rugby union footballers for Canadian players of other kinds of football. kelvSYC 11:38, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.