Talk:Rock and Roll Hall of Fame

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 12 months

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on January 23, 2005 and January 23, 2006.

Cleveland High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Cleveland, the scope of which includes Cleveland and the Greater Cleveland Area. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.ClevelandWikipedia:WikiProject ClevelandTemplate:WikiProject ClevelandCleveland articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Ohio Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as High-importance).

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rock music Mid‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Museums High‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Henkejames (talk · contribs) / Rock and Roll Hall of Fame This user has contributed to the article.

Other Criticisms

I've seen various other things criticized:

Lack of progressive rock
Neglect of backing groups
Emphasis on rap in recent years

This will need proper sourcing/citation of course, but I just wanted to mention this. Wolf O'Donnel (talk) 05:07, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

+1, their focus on only USA-UK bands, ignoring the rest of the world's great bands.

_JuaиPa_

^{†_Kommentarios_†} 06:26, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

Perhaps the editor who made this revert can explain why.[1] --2603:7000:2143:8500:9908:4467:7D2D:5F71 (talk) 04:38, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. The term "gossip blogger" is un-encyclopedic. It is not a neutral term. KitHutch (talk) 22:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

25 years

I thought the rule was changed to the record has to have been released at least 26 years ago. RyanDalziel (talk) 07:31, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Critical of some criticism

I'm not a fan of the organization, and I'm not the biggest rock fan either, but it says right there in the name "Hall of Fame". It doesn't say "Hall of Quality", "Hall of Authenticity", or "Hall of Genuine Contributors". Perhaps the name is intentionally this way. TooManyFingers (talk) 01:18, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect English

As of the date and time I'm typing this, the article contains "The groundbreaking opening ceremony took place on June 7, 1993". That's an oxymoron. When there is a ribbon-cutting ceremony (such as the one described occurring at a LATER date in this same article), that's almost always the same thing as "opening ceremony". "Groundbreaking ceremony" is a completely different thing. It's when fame-seeking celebrities and petty government officials desiring a photo-op don hi-visibility vests and hard-hats and turn over a few shovels-full of soil to "begin construction" the first part of which is excavating below original surface level. So it's almost impossible for there to be such a thing as "groundbreaking opening ceremony". The word "almost" is in my typing because if I try really hard I can think of how people might rebuke me if I left it out. If the word "groundbreaking" is a metaphor for something like the first time a citizen of Estonia was invited to a U.S. event, then it's possible. Also, if there is a self-serve diamond-mine such as Arkansas's where diggers pay to sift dirt at the surface and keep their finds, the necessary buildings for a cashier, tool-rental, and bathrooms might be constructed first, with the first paying customer's first stab into the dirt with a shovel being considered both "the groundbreaking" and "the opening". But that's not the case here.2600:1700:6759:B000:D8B6:4F13:141:8567 (talk) 22:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Christopher Lawrence Simpson[reply]

Thanks for spotting this. I removed "opening ceremony" altogether from that section and linked to the actual Groundbreaking page. There's also now a dedicated reference for the 1993 ceremony in the article. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 22:41, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Citations?

Seems like there is a lack of citations throughout this article. Was wondering if that was normal or not since I'm a first time wiki editor. However, just in the opening two paragraphs there isn't any citations for any of the facts mentioned within those paragraphs. In addition, in many of the other paragraphs in other sections there just seems to be a lack of verifiable sources to back up certain statements made. Oliva j1 (talk) 01:24, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]